So, the problem is, how far can one go without losing the audience? How much are people willing to believe? At what point does the reader just throw the book off the bed and hiss, "OK, now you are just pissing me off!"?
For example, I am writing a story about a fictitious urban school district in a modern American town. Like all school district, this one professed to be "all about the kids", and so, in order to better itself and its schools, this district- let's call it BSISD - hired a very expensive consulting firm to measure the morale of the schools it ran, on the grounds that happy workers are productive workers who will churn out a quality product, which in this case is a well-educated, college-ready kid. The consultants generated charts and graphs in four colors and powerpoints with background music and short, humorous film clips that were both entertaining and enlightening. They developed questionnaires and methods for scrutinizing the validity of both the questions and the answers of the surveys, and then created MORE charts, graphs and powerpoints, using more colors, music and film clips to showcase the data that was collected. This took approximately three years, and then the consultants set about analyzing the data using a variety of criteria and comparisons that would determine if the Operational Health of the organization - the school- was healthy or not. This cost billions of dollars, but BSISD had long ago decided that expensive consultants were the best kind, and that the more they charged, the better the results proved to be.
Five years later, the firm had enough data and colored charts to create an Operational Health Index (OHI), in which a deliriously happy school would score 100 points. The BSISD was so concerned with getting data for the OHI to find out if the teachers and students in the schools were content, that the administration of the district had long ago stopped accepting complaints from the teachers and the students who voiced discontent for any reason. The theory was that they would get the chance to express their opinions on the well-researched questionnaires, which would then be dissected and analyzed be well-paid professional consultants. Then and only then could the results be disseminated and understood.
All of that was just background to the story. Exposition, if you will. Are ya still with me? It gets better...
CHAPTER ONE: Once upon a time there was a little elementary school in a large , urban school district called the BSISD. At one time there had been a happy faculty there, who lovingly taught adorable little kids how to color, count with beans, settle down for story time, tie their shoes, play the triangle or cowbells, and take naps. They sang lots of songs and performed plays about Thanksgiving, and they celebrated each others birthdays and Valentines. Some of the classes had a bird or a hamster or a goldfish, and everybody learned about responsibility by taking turns feeding the pets and cleaning their cages. The pets were usually named "Sunny" or "Fuzzy" or "Mr. Wiggles." For the children, it was a great place to start their education, and every day, they skipped eagerly, hand in hand to the classrooms with their tiny chairs and cubby holes. When they graduated from the third grade, they knew how to read, write, add, subtract, multiply and divide, color inside the lines, the Pledge of Allegiance, that the policeman was their friend, and that even though Charlotte died, she had lived a good life and would never be forgotten.
However, times had changed.
OK, so Chapter One seems pretty likely. Nothing impossible here. I like the idea of a fish named Fuzzy.
CHAPTER TWO: The little elementary school was no longer a happy place. Someone had decided that the kids should all be the same, with all the same skills, talents and goals, and so programs had been cut in order to make way for classes that molded and restructured them. No more recess or nap time. No more arts and crafts; only worksheets, and only coloring INSIDE of the lines. Mr. Wiggles died and was never replaced. Students were instructed to walk only on the right side of the halls, no talking, hands to themselves. They wore little uniforms, and had a prescribed amount of homework every night. Some of the reading classes were taught from a script that the BSISD issued to the teachers every month. The script had segments for group snapping and clapping, and students and teachers were judged on their timing and adherence to the instructions on the page. There was no music. Parties were strictly forbidden, due to a lack of educational value, and plays took way too much time.
If a child wouldn't fit into the mold, more rigid molds were created, as experts decided that all kids could be the same, if only they were motivated properly. Blind kids can learn to squint, and a good teacher never gave up on a child's ability to master what had once seemed impossible. It was up to the teachers to motivate the children properly. This was stressful, as some students still insisted on being themselves. Teachers received training, and then more training. The training was always the same. It started off like this: "You are here because you are a bad teacher. Regardless of your years of experience or personal victories, you have always been a bad teacher. You must change. If you don't change, you will be fired. You will become acceptable by copying data from computer screens onto spreadsheets, folders and stickers. Now let's make some foldable graphic organizers to illustrate what we've learned."
The teachers were sad, too. Many were scared, for themselves, yes, but also for their students, who they loved.
Chapter Two is getting a little out there. We live in a free society, and this is downright Orwellian. Nobody would believe that all kids are the same! That's just stupid. That part about the teacher training is preposterous, too. What the hell is foldable?
Should I even go on? I know how this story ends up. Have I lost you already? Too ridiculous? Let me know if you are interested in Chapter Three, though I think I already know what your response will be - nobody really cares about the public schools, especially when the story is long, complex, unbelievable and depressing.
I am interested. I want to know about culturally diverse written texts. I am looking at the student family guide for the 5th grade TAKS reading test, and many of the goals refer to culturally diverse written texts.
ReplyDeleteBy adding the words 'culturally diverse', does the Texas Education Agency mean to reach out to non-English readers? Or are they saying that reading in Texas is more than comprehending written language, that it also includes understanding several cultures?
Hi there, soldier!
ReplyDeleteI don't think the TEA cares all that much about education, never mind culturally diverse education. They are just another great bureaucracy, inventing positions for themselves to legitimize their paychecks, much in the same way that they invent terminology to sound progressive and inclusive. The TEA works in conjunction with the Texas State Board of Education, and if you have been following the news lately, you see how diverse and interested in other cultures they are!It's embarrassing and pathetic.I'm sorry I sound so bitter, but I am. Anyhoo, yours is the first vote for continuation of the story, so I just may write it! Thank you for commenting!
I can not tell you how many freakin' foldables I have made for BSISD and its neighbors. Please continue with Chapter three! I am hoping the story gets happier (I'm very cautiously optimistic...I know, it may not be realistic but it gets me through the day).
ReplyDeleteIn Chapter 2 –Those kids actually walk on lines taped on the right side of the hall, with their hands behind their backs or to their sides so they don't touch anything or anyone. Just thought you should know.
ReplyDeleteCaptivating. I think I am familiar with this story. I would love to read chapter 3, but I know that in BSISD there isn't a happy ending in sight.
ReplyDelete